Tuesday, January 17, 2017

San Jose Newspaper Covers Up Corruption By San Jose City Officials

Post 15/23

On January 13, 2017, the San Jose Inside (SJI), a local San Jose newspaper, published an article regarding San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo and the San Jose City Council's committment to provide more oversight of the City's police department. I responded to the article with two comments criticizing the Mayor and City Council for calling for more oversight of the police while they are engaged in a criminal cover-up of cheating by retired federal district judge Ronald M. Whyte and the San Jose City Attoreny's Office during the litigation of two lawsuits I filed against the City. My two comments were initially posted by SJI then later removed for unspecified reasons. It is clear SJI is providing cover for the Mayor and City Council by removing my comments an refusing to report on the cheating scandal that I am exposing with this blog. Below is a copy of the article by SJI dated January 14, 2017 that include my comments appearing under my name (Fred Bates) as comments #2 and 5:

Saturday, January 14, 2017
A look inside San Jose politics and culture
San Jose Inside is made possible through support by:
  • Metro Silicon Valley
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
San Jose Mayor Commits to Expanding Police Oversight
SJPD Chief Eddie Garcia discusses systemic racism at a community forum Thursday.
SJPD Chief Eddie Garcia discusses systemic racism at a community forum Thursday.
San Jose’s mayor and some council members said they want greater oversight of local law enforcement and would support a ballot measure to expand the role of the city’s independent police watchdog.
Before a packed auditorium at Bible Way Christian Center Thursday night, Mayor Sam Liccardo said he supports placing such a voter initiative on the 2018 ballot.
“Back when the charter was amended, establishing our office in 1996, I think the IPA’s model was really the standard,” Independent Police Auditor Walter Katz told San Jose Inside. “But it’s been 20 years since then, and I think there’s some voices in the community that say it’s time to reconsider.”
Along with City Council members Magdalena Carrasco and Raul Peralez, the mayor and police Chief Eddie Garcia also promised to release public reports on use-of-force incidents, a practice that was discontinued in 2006.
“I know that one of the holdups right now has been the technology itself,” said Peralez, a former San Jose police officer. But, he added, “This is information that absolutely needs to be shared with the community.”
The commitments came at the end of a forum on how to mend the relationship between police and civilians whose faith in law enforcement is badly shaken. Hosted by People Acting in Community Together (PACT), the event drew roughly 300 attendees and a host of high-ranking law enforcement and elected officials.
Garcia opened the discussion by talking about how bias in law enforcement is an extension of entrenched structural racism.
“The reality is that we’re caught up in this wheel of the justice system, but the justice system starts well before that … [in our] child welfare system, our schools,” he said.
The department is trying to improve its internal oversight, the chief added. Part of that includes training officers on how to recognize their own biases. Garcia also apologized for any offense caused by a video released in November by the local police union. The minute-long clip released by the San Jose Police Officers’ Association highlighted the uptick in officer killings ended with declarations that “All Lives Matter” and “Blue Lives Matter,” slogans created to protest the Black Lives Matter movement.
“We’re not perfect,” Garcia said. “We will have bumps along the road, but in the end we need you to know that we are here for you.”
Speaking to issues of accountability at the regional level, Santa Clara County Supervisor Joe Simitian said he wants to install independent oversight of the jails and Sheriff’s Office, too. In the aftermath of Michael Brown’s killing at the hands of a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, the supervisor pushed for a slate of accountability measures to prevent similar tragedies. Some of those changes include training sheriff’s deputies to recognize implicit bias and wear cameras to record their interactions in the line of duty.
In 2015, the fatal beating of Michael Tyree, a mentally ill inmate at San Jose’s Main Jail, brought greater urgency to those reform efforts and exposed alarming systemic dysfunction in county jails.
Dep. Roger Winslow, head of the union that represents sheriff’s deputies, agreed with Simitian that the Sheriff’s Office needs independent oversight of enforcement, administration and custody. His counterpart at the jail guard union, however, thought otherwise. Lt. Amy Le, president of the Correctional Peace Officers’ Association, said she’s against independent review of internal and external department complaints.
“I’m sorry,” Le said. “At this time, I cannot support that decision.”
Newly installed cameras capture events inside the jails, she added, and officers document every incident as they occur. That, in her and the union’s opinion, is enough.
“Give us a chance for transparency,” Le said. “The use-of-force system is changing. We are documenting everything.”
Between Garcia’s initial remarks and public declarations from other officials, the audience split into smaller groups, each assigned an officer who volunteered to hear them out. Elvira Obregon, a social worker and local activist, asked one officer to explain why so many viral videos show police escalating tensions to the point of violence.
“A lot of times in these videos, the situation doesn’t call for that level of force,” Obregon said. “We hear all this talk of de-escalation, but that’s not what’s we’re seeing.”
Officer Jose Montoya, a 17-year SJPD veteran, told her that he can’t speak for other agencies but stressed that those videos often tell just a fraction of the story.
“When police arrive, it’s because there’s a problem,”Montoya said. “It’s because there’s contact, somebody’s in crisis, somebody needs help or somebody broke the law.”
“You must admit that there’s some rotten apples in the bunch,” Obregon replied.
“Yes,” Montoya agreed, “as there is in any profession.”
“Would you be brave enough to call them out?” she asked.
“I would,” he said.
Officer Jose Montoya (center) listens as Carmen Johnson (right) talks about a negative interaction she had with a San Jose cop. (Photo by Jennifer Wadsworth)
Officer Jose Montoya (center) listens as Carmen Johnson (right) talks about a negative interaction she had with a San Jose police officer.
This article has been updated. 
Jennifer Wadsworth is a staff writer for San Jose Inside and Metro Newspaper. Email tips to jenniferw@metronews.com or follow her on Twitter at @jennwadsworth.
Filed Under:
3 Comments
  1. Jack Slade Jan 13, 2017 @ 1:17 pm
Nonsense, you still have a useless individual getting $150,000 + for a rubber stamp. The City only wants to have control over cover ups and Civil Suit payouts.
  1. Fred Bates Jan 13, 2017 @ 9:53 pm
Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Here we go again. The Mayor and City Council calling for more oversight of the police while they are engaged in one of the biggest cover-ups in recent memory of their own bigoted and malicious acts against me. The racists and bigots calling for more oversight of the police out of some clearly phony concern about racism. Go figure. I have posted comments here before.about this scandal. However, SJI refused to post my comments the last time I tried. Jennifer and Josh you ought to be ashamed. This from you freedom of speech and press loving journalsits. At least let the public know about the very real lawsuits I filed against the City that has cost taxpayers thousands fo dollars. My warning to the Mayor and City Council. This scandal will not go away and it will one day be exposed big time. Just watch and see. See these links for more: https://www.facebook.com/groups/624131267713226/
http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-san-jose-mayor-sam-licardo-and-city-council
http://crnctz.blogspot.com/2015/08/exposing-cover-up-of-cheating-scandal.html
  1. Empty Gun Jan 13, 2017 @ 10:32 pm
We could solve all this nonsense if we just fast forward to firing all the white men and hiring nothing but brown women,
then everything will be just peachy
  1. John Kracht Jan 14, 2017 @ 7:12 am
Haven’t heard anything from the San Jose Police Officers Association? Time to step up.
  1. Fred Bates Jan 14, 2017 @ 7:51 am
Your comment is awaiting moderation.

SJI pushes false narratives just like much of the media. We need more oversight of SJPD like I need a hole in my head. It is the corrupt Mayor and City Council that needs more oversight because of their criminal misconduct involving the cover-up of cheating by retired federal district judge Ronald M. Whtye and the City Attorney’s Office during the litigation of my two lawsuits. Their misconduct is based on real bigotry and racism, and not some phony notion. But don’t take my word for it. Ask the Mayor and City Council if I am lying and just being malicious. Ask them what happened to the two attorneys for the City that suddenly disappeared from my case and why Judge Whyte suddenly retired. If am lying, I would hope to be held accountable with civil and criminal sanctions. I know Jennifer wrote this article, but this is for Josh. The City has a “Whyte” privilege problem and not a “White” privilege problem. Since I’m black, I can’t wait to see what phony celebration the City will have for MLK day. See the links listed in my comment above for details about the cheating scandal.
Leave a Reply 
________________________________________________________________________________

Below is a copy of the latest version of the same article by SJI dated January 16, 2017 that clearly shows that my comments criticizing the Mayor and City Council have been removed. It is clear SJI has no journalistic integrity because my comments were removed with the intent to hide the bigoted and criminal misconduct of the corrupt Mayor and City Council. SJI has no commitment to freedom of speech and expression:















San Jose Mayor Commits to Expanding Police Oversight

San Jose’s mayor and some council members said they want greater oversight of local law enforcement and would support a ballot measure to expand the role of the city’s independent police watchdog.
Before a packed auditorium at Bible Way Christian Center Thursday night, Mayor Sam Liccardo said he supports placing such a voter initiative on the 2018 ballot.
“Back when the charter was amended, establishing our office in 1996, I think the IPA’s model was really the standard,” Independent Police Auditor Walter Katz told San Jose Inside. “But it’s been 20 years since then, and I think there’s some voices in the community that say it’s time to reconsider.”
Along with City Council members Magdalena Carrasco and Raul Peralez, the mayor and police Chief Eddie Garcia also promised to release public reports on use-of-force incidents, a practice that was discontinued in 2006.
“I know that one of the holdups right now has been the technology itself,” said Peralez, a former San Jose police officer. But, he added, “This is information that absolutely needs to be shared with the community.”
The commitments came at the end of a forum on how to mend the relationship between police and civilians whose faith in law enforcement is badly shaken. Hosted by People Acting in Community Together (PACT), the event drew roughly 300 attendees and a host of high-ranking law enforcement and elected officials.
Garcia opened the discussion by talking about how bias in law enforcement is an extension of entrenched structural racism.
“The reality is that we’re caught up in this wheel of the justice system, but the justice system starts well before that … [in our] child welfare system, our schools,” he said.
The department is trying to improve its internal oversight, the chief added. Part of that includes training officers on how to recognize their own biases. Garcia also apologized for any offense caused by a video released in November by the local police union. The minute-long clip released by the San Jose Police Officers’ Association highlighted the uptick in officer killings ended with declarations that “All Lives Matter” and “Blue Lives Matter,” slogans created to protest the Black Lives Matter movement.
“We’re not perfect,” Garcia said. “We will have bumps along the road, but in the end we need you to know that we are here for you.”
Speaking to issues of accountability at the regional level, Santa Clara County Supervisor Joe Simitian said he wants to install independent oversight of the jails and Sheriff’s Office, too. In the aftermath of Michael Brown’s killing at the hands of a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, the supervisor pushed for a slate of accountability measures to prevent similar tragedies. Some of those changes include training sheriff’s deputies to recognize implicit bias and wear cameras to record their interactions in the line of duty.
In 2015, the fatal beating of Michael Tyree, a mentally ill inmate at San Jose’s Main Jail, brought greater urgency to those reform efforts and exposed alarming systemic dysfunction in county jails.
Dep. Roger Winslow, head of the union that represents sheriff’s deputies, agreed with Simitian that the Sheriff’s Office needs independent oversight of enforcement, administration and custody. His counterpart at the jail guard union, however, thought otherwise. Lt. Amy Le, president of the Correctional Peace Officers’ Association, said she’s against independent review of internal and external department complaints.
“I’m sorry,” Le said. “At this time, I cannot support that decision.”
Newly installed cameras capture events inside the jails, she added, and officers document every incident as they occur. That, in her and the union’s opinion, is enough.
“Give us a chance for transparency,” Le said. “The use-of-force system is changing. We are documenting everything.”
Between Garcia’s initial remarks and public declarations from other officials, the audience split into smaller groups, each assigned an officer who volunteered to hear them out. Elvira Obregon, a social worker and local activist, asked one officer to explain why so many viral videos show police escalating tensions to the point of violence.
“A lot of times in these videos, the situation doesn’t call for that level of force,” Obregon said. “We hear all this talk of de-escalation, but that’s not what’s we’re seeing.”
Officer Jose Montoya, a 17-year SJPD veteran, told her that he can’t speak for other agencies but stressed that those videos often tell just a fraction of the story.
“When police arrive, it’s because there’s a problem,”Montoya said. “It’s because there’s contact, somebody’s in crisis, somebody needs help or somebody broke the law.”
“You must admit that there’s some rotten apples in the bunch,” Obregon replied.
“Yes,” Montoya agreed, “as there is in any profession.”
“Would you be brave enough to call them out?” she asked.
“I would,” he said.
Officer Jose Montoya (center) listens as Carmen Johnson (right) talks about a negative interaction she had with a San Jose cop. (Photo by Jennifer Wadsworth)
Officer Jose Montoya (center) listens as Carmen Johnson (right) talks about a negative interaction she had with a San Jose police officer.
This article has been updated. 
Jennifer Wadsworth is a staff writer for San Jose Inside and Metro Newspaper. Email tips to jenniferw@metronews.com or follow her on Twitter at @jennwadsworth.

8 Comments

  1. Nonsense, you still have a useless individual getting $150,000 + for a rubber stamp. The City only wants to have control over cover ups and Civil Suit payouts.
  2. We could solve all this nonsense if we just fast forward to firing all the white men and hiring nothing but brown women,
    then everything will be just peachy
    • TIme to step up. Another one of the loud minority that gets 90% airtime. San Jose has no idea how good they have had it.
  3. San Jose Mayor Commits to Expanding Police Oversight
    Just remove the word ‘oversight’, and we’ll be good to go…
  4. I think we should give less oversight to the IPA. Officers have body worn cameras now and they will tell the story. There will be less complaints. The complaints that do come in most likely can be addressed with training for particular officers. I don’t want my police force to be hamstrung by more red tape. I want them to make my community safe again.
    In my opinion, this is just more voter pandering by the mayor.
    FUN FACTS:
    2014-2015 SJPD received 564,528 911 calls and made 100,579 field events (i.e. traffic stops). With all those citizen contacts the IPA and SJPD received 303 complaints. In percentage, that is .00045%. Of those 303 complaints citizens (and criminals) didn’t like the way they were talked to and didn’t think they should have been arrested at all.
    In 2015 the IPA budget for six people was $1,249,223.
    The IPA makes at least $178,000 a year.
    The IPA went to 172 IPA presentation, community events, meet and greets
    Once Cordell left the IPA position IPA complaints dropped from 51% to 39%
    SJPD made 55,000 less field events (i.e. car stops) then 2010-2011 year.
    • Obviously if we can improve the complaint record of the SJPD by 12% by removing Ladoris Cordell we could reduce
      complaints all together by removing three of the remaining IPA members. That being said we we will no longer be needing an IPA and can thereby shut it down saving the city a total of $1,249,223 per year.
      This would make funds avalible to hire 8.328 more badly needed cops of any color.
      There, that was fun and I’ve solved another one of our problems!
      Five more days till Trump is President, are you all still here?
  5. Why don’t we survey SJPD customer satisfaction?
    Many departments use surveys and realize benefits. It’s inexpensive, provides an early warning system (IPA and Internal Affairs do not), provides benchmarks against other PDs, and pinpoints what’s working and what’s not.
    Unlike the SJ Auditor or the Civil Grand Jury, IPA’s self-identified mission is to find fault – but not exemplary performance. Customer satisfaction surveys do both.
    The SJ residents survey shows perception of safety has declined by about about 50% since 2011. See page 19 of Auditor’s 2015-2016 report http://www.sanjoseca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/63203
    Most metrics have steadily and precipitously declined. ‘Would You Recommend Living in SJ’ has declined from 80% in 2011 to 51% in the last survey period.
    Mayor Liccardo’s priorities are misguided.

Leave a Reply


No comments:

Post a Comment