Showing posts with label Russia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Russia. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Trump Is Right For Questioning FBI Director Christopher Wray's Attitude

Post #60 (December 10, 2019)

FBI Director Christopher Wray stated in an interview on ABC on Monday (12/9/2019) that he would take serious the findings of the Inspector General (IG) that there were numerous errors by the FBI during the investigation of the Trump campaign in 2016. However, Director Wray pointed out that the IG found that the probe into the Trump campaign was opened with appropriate predication and authorization, and that there was no evidence of political bias when the FBI began investigating political contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Clearly, President Trump is not satisfied with Director Wray's response to the IG's report. He tweeted earlier today that he did not believe Director Wray was reading the same report that he, President Trump, had been given. Mr. Trump stated that because of Director Wray's attitude, he will never be able to fix the FBI, which is badly broken despite having some of the greatest men and women working there.

Just as I stated in a post on December 6, 2017, I am again saying that the President calling out Director Wray in his tweet today has credibility. Since 2014, I have filed public corruption complaints with the FBI against the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, the US District Court in San Jose, and several San Jose city officials. Even though I presented indisputable evidence that these officials committed several felonies during the litigation of two discrimination lawsuits I filed against the City of San Jose, Director Wray and the FBI refused to respond to my complaints. It is sufficiently clear that Director Wray and the FBI have problems with ethics. President Trump is right to believe that Director Wray cannot fix the problems at the FBI because of his apparent lack of resolve to do so. Below is a copy of a complaint I filed with Inspector General Horowitz against Director Wray:

Frederick Bates
                                                                                                            ----------------
                                                                                                            ---------------
                                                                                                            (408) ---------

March 18, 2019

Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
1717 H Street, NW, Suite 825
Washington, DC 20006
Attn: Michael Horowitz – Inspector General

Re: Public Corruption Complaints

Dear Mr. Horowitz,

            I respectfully request that you open an investigation into the conduct of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (F.B.I.) and the Department of Justice based on their failure to open an investigation into public corruption complaints I filed against San Jose city officials and officials with the U.S. District Court – San Jose Division and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. My complaints, in the form of letters, allege that these officials committed several felonies during the litigation of two lawsuits I filed against the City of San Jose for racial and disability discrimination. I am black/African American. The crimes I allege against these officials include conspiracy to obstruct justice and obstruction of justice, subornation of perjury and perjury, bribery, and fraud. Accompanying my complaint letters to the F.B.I. and Department of Justice was credible evidence supporting my allegations. Here is a list of my complaint letters with the dates and the parties to whom they were directed, as well as dates of meetings with F.B.I. officials:

May 24, 2014 – Letter to Special Agent in Charge David J. Johnson – San Francisco F.B.I. Field Office
May 24, 2014 – Letter to Melinda Haag – U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of California
June 17, 2015 – Email letter to F.B.I. San Francisco Field Office that documents a phone contact with an F.B.I. employee in the San Francisco Field Office and a meeting with an F.B.I. agent in the Jackson Mississippi Field Office
July 24, 2017 – Letter to U.S. Department of Justice-Washington, D.C. (To Whom It May Concern)
July 27, 2017 – Letter to F.B.I. Headquarters-Washington, D.C. (To Whom It May Concern)
July 29, 2017 – Letter to Brian Stretch – U.S. Attorney’s Office-Northern District of California
July 29, 2017 – Letter to Special Agent in Charge John F. Bennett - San Francisco F.B.I. Field Office
August 18, 2017 – Documentation of meeting with F.B.I. Special Agent in Sacramento, CA Field Office
                                                                                                                                    Page 2
                                                                                                           
October 24, 2017 – Letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions                                       
October 30, 2017 – Letter to F.B.I. Director Christopher Wray
April 16, 2018 - Letter to F.B.I. Director Christopher Wray
April 16, 2018 - Letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions

Included with this letter are copies of the above letters and evidence attached to each that proves they were delivered to the above officials. For this reason, I am making a complaint against each for failure to take action and for engaging in a cover-up. I am well aware that the F.B.I. and the Department of Justice does not normally intervene in matters involving the courts based on the separation of powers doctrine. However, when there is credible evidence that court officials have engaged in public corruption, as is the case here, the F.B.I. and Department of Justice is obligated to investigate the crimes involved in order to protect the integrity of our judicial system. Clearly, the officials that received my complaint letters had a legal and moral duty to take action.
            What is clear to me from the contact I had with F.B.I. agents and the lack of response to my complaint letters is that there seems to be no interest in opening an investigation into this matter, even though this is one of the greatest abuses of power and breaches of the public trust by government officials in recent memory. And it is certainly one of the biggest frauds on the court and cheating scandals in the history of our judiciary.
            Along with the copies of the complaint letters noted above is an attachment that contain facts and evidence that corroborate the obstruction of justice/public corruption crimes I allege against San Jose city officials and officials with the U.S. District Court – San Jose Division and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Also included is a pdf file on a flash drive containing a complaint letter and documents I sent to Chief Judge Sidney R. Thomas of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The letter and documents sent to Judge Thomas provides more facts and evidence to support my allegations.
            Additionally, I am requesting an investigation of San Jose city officials for conducting an investigation of me in September 2018 that was malicious, retaliatory and meant to intimidate me and to violate my rights to free speech based on two emails I sent City officials relative to the criminal misconduct of City officials and the courts during litigation of the two lawsuits I filed against the City. The details surrounding the investigation by the City are also enclosed in a separate attachment. Please advise me of what action you will take in this matter.


                                                                                                            Sincerely,



                                                                                                            Frederick Bates

Monday, July 31, 2017

Trump - Russian Collusion? vs. San Jose City Officials Collusion with the US District Court

Post 18/23

I am somewhat skeptical about the motivation for all of the investigations and media coverage into Russia's meddling into the past presidential election and potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Here is what we know from current and former government officials in the intelligence and law enforcement communities, including former president Obama. Russia's meddling did not influence the outcome of the election and it did not change a single vote. Also, no evidence has been presented to the American people that implicates Trump and the Russian government working together to undermine the presidential election. As a matter of fact, the Obama Administration did very little when it learned of Russia's meddling prior to the election. Mr. Obama stated in October 2016 that it would be impossible to rig a presidential election because they are so decentralized. Officials with the DNC refused to turn over their server to the FBI after allegedly being hacked by the Russians. It did not appear to be that big of a deal to Hillary Clinton and Democratic operatives because they were winning in the polls. Now that Ms. Clinton has lost and  Mr. Trump has ascended to the Presidency, politicians, bureaucrats in Washington on both sides, as well as the media, have all of this newfound concern about Russia's meddling and a possible connection to Trump. All of the investigations into this scandal seem to be justified based on the notion that Russian interference undermined our electoral process and threatened our democracy. While I do not disagree with that notion, I think politics and an anti-Trump agenda is at play here and we might actually be witnessing a witch hunt. We will have to wait and see.

Let us now take a look at the collusion between San Jose mayor Sam Liccardo, the San Jose City Council , San Jose City Attorney Richard Doyle and the US District Court for the Northern District of California - San Jose Division. During the litigation of a lawsuit I filed against the City of San Jose in August 2006, the City Attorney's Office at the behest of the City Council colluded with the US District Court in creating false documents, falsifying court records, and staging a phony hearing on a Rule 60 motion I filed seeking relief from the bogus judgment of the district court that granted the City's motion for summary judgment. The City's motion for summary judgment was a total hoax. It was based on a false premise and supported by the perjured testimony of two corrupt police officials. One official was bribed for his testimony. Additionally, the district court violated two important federal laws limiting its discretion. Unlike the Trump-Russia collusion scandal, this collusion scandal has underlining criminal acts, and the clear intent to obstruct justice. San Jose city officials and the courts are engaged in a big cover-up of this scandal. Mayor Liccardo and the City Council refused to conduct investigations into my discrimination and misconduct complaints against the City Attorney's Office and three police administrators as is mandated by City policy and state law. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the US District Court entered totally bogus judgments that favor the City on motions for relief I filed. All of this is true folks. There's no witch hunt here. Don't take my word for it. Ask Mayor Liccardo, the City Council and the folks over at the US District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Now Let's do some comparisons here. As to Russia's meddling into the election, there is no evidence that it influenced the outcome. As to Trump-Russia collusion, so far there is no evidence of any at all, just innuendo. As to the collusion between San Jose city officials and the US District Court, you have several underlining felonies relating to public corruption with the clear intent to obstruct justice. There are several investigations going on into the Trump-Russia scandal with the dubious claim by our elected officials in Washington that they are so concerned about protecting our electoral process and our democracy. They are at the same time calling for punishing Russia with sanctions. On the other hand, not a single investigation has been conducted into numerous complaints I have filed against San Jose city officials and the courts for public corruption which has caused ten times more harm to our constitutional republic than Russia's meddling into our presidential election.

Granted protecting our electoral process is a legitimate reason for investigating Russia's meddling into our presidential election. But by all accounts no real damage was done. On the other hand, the collusion between San Jose city officials and the courts has caused immeasurable harm to our judicial system and our democracy. Clearly an investigation into this scandal is warranted just as an investigation into possible collusion between Russia and Trump. Our judicial process is as equally sacred as our electoral process.Yet, many of the same politicians and non-elected government officials that are calling for investigations into the Trump-Russia scandal have not shown any courage by calling for an investigation into the collusion between San Jose city officials and the federal courts. A rigged election would be intolerable by politicians and all Americans. Rightfully so. Yet, politicians in Washington have developed a tolerance for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and many of the district courts within the Ninth Circuit that are rigged against average Americans. It time to hold them accountable just as we are the Russians.