Today House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff is making oral arguments for the HOR in the Senate's impeachment trial of President Trump. Just as Democrats have stated on numerous occasions, Schiff is trying to make the case that Trump was impeached in order to protect the Constitution and democracy. Congressman Schiff is a liar and a fraud. In a letter dated April 27, 2018, long before this sham impeachment by Democrats, I pleaded with Congressman Schiff to help me assert my constitutional rights that were violated by the City of San Jose, the US District Court in San Jose, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals during the litigation of two discrimination lawsuits I filed against the City of San Jose. I am black/African American. Not only did the City and the courts violate my constitutional rights to due process and equal protection of the law, but they also committed several crimes that include bribery, conspiracy, fraud, obstruction of justice, subornation of perjury and perjury. These crimes fall well within the constitutional requirements for impeachment, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. Congressman Schiff refused to respond to my complaint letter, and he refused to open an investigation into my complaint. It is an absolute certainty that our federal judiciary, particularly the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, is far more corrupt and dysfunctional than the White House; and is a bigger threat to democracy than Trump. Yet, thanks in part to Adam Schiff, the President is facing removal from office for conduct that's clearly not impeachable under the Constitution. While at the same time, several federal judges are being protected by Schiff who has made a conscious decision to cover up their impeachable offenses committed during the litigation of my two lawsuits against the City of San Jose. Corrupt federal judges have, in many cases, suspended the Constitution and placed them themselves above the law. Ironically, Adam Schiff and the Democrats are making these claims against President Trump and are now trying to remove him from office based on a phone call he made with President Zelensky of Ukraine.
It is outrageous that Congressman Schiff can stand before the Senate and the American people and condemn the President in a dubious claim that he is standing up for the Constitution and the rule of law while refusing to stand up for the constitutional rights of a black/African American citizen. It is clear that Congressman Schiff cares less about the Constitution and more about removing Trump from office by any means. Below is a copy of
the letter I sent to Congressman Schiff:
Frederick Bates
------------------
Folsom,
CA 95630
(408) -----------
April
27, 2018
Congressman
Adam Schiff
2372
Rayburn House Office Building
Washington,
D.C. 20515
Re:
Public corruption complaint against officials with the City of San Jose, the
U.S. District Court – San Jose Division and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Dear
Congressman Schiff,
The purpose of this letter is to bring
to your attention public corruption complaints I filed with the F.B.I., the
Department of Justice, the House Judiciary Committee, and Chief Judge Sidney R.
Thomas of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals against officials with the City of
San Jose, the U.S. District Court – San Jose Division and the Ninth Circuit Court
of Appeals relative to two lawsuits I filed against the City. Please be aware
that I have also notified several other members of Congress seeking their help
in opening an investigation into my complaints. The members of Congress
include, Senators Feinstein, Harris, McCain and Graham; Speaker Paul Ryan,
House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte and Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren. So far I
have only received one response from Senator Feinstein that does not address my
request for an investigation.
I have enclosed copies of my
complaints that contain indisputable facts and evidence that San Jose city
officials conspired with district court officials to obstruct justice during
the litigation of my first lawsuit by falsifying court dockets, creating a
false document regarding a fraudulent stipulation of dismissal and staging a
fake hearing on a Rule 60 motion I filed and then creating a false transcript
of that purported hearing. It should be noted that I was told by a court
official over the phone and in person that there would be no hearing on my
motion. As to my second lawsuit, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals officials
terminated an appeal I filed challenging the district court’s denial of my
motion for relief from judgment without allowing me to file an opening brief.
It is unmistakable that the judgments in both of my lawsuits are flagrantly
biased, based on fraud, and are inconsistent with federal statutory law, the
U.S. Constitution and binding precedent of the Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals. The judgments are void and unenforceable by law. Yet, the
judgments are being enforced by the courts. I find this to be intolerable.
I
am well aware that I do not reside in your congressional district and that you
are not my representative in Congress. I am bringing this matter to your
attention out of extreme anger and frustration because of the lack of response
my complaints have gotten by members of Congress, the Judiciary Committee, the
F.B.I. and D.O.J. I am counting on you to take action on my complaints based on
a statement you made during the impeachment of former district judge Thomas
Porteous Jr. During those proceedings, you stated that litigants have the right
to expect a judge hearing their case will be fair and impartial, and avoid even
the appearance of impropriety.
Page
2
Not
only were the judges in my cases biased, they made no attempt at all to avoid
the appearance of impropriety.
My
anger and frustration also results from the fact that as a black/African
American that grew up in the South during Jim Crow I have been treated with less
respect and dignity by San Jose city officials and the federal courts than I
was treated by the segregationist government officials I encountered. I am desperate
to obtain a fair resolution to this matter. To that end, I am willing to take
some extreme measures. This is not a threat to engage in violence. But going to
jail in protest of this blatantly racist and bigoted violation of my rights by
San Jose city officials and the courts is clearly an option for me. At this
point, I feel I have nothing to lose.
It
is absolutely stunning that many of the same members of Congress I notified
about my complaints called President Trump a racist based on an alleged comment
he made about African countries in a private meeting. But they have done
nothing in regards to my complaints, even though I allege that San Jose city
officials discriminated against me based on my race and disability, and that
these officials committed several crimes relating to public corruption. It is
also stunning that San Jose city officials and courts within the Ninth Circuit
are willing to grant privileges to undocumented immigrants and refugees while
at the same time I am being deprived of my rights that are guaranteed by law. Many
of the members of Congress I just mentioned in this letter, including you,
support the pro immigrant efforts of San Jose city officials and the federal
courts. Certainly, one would think that I should be treated with the same
respect and dignity as non-citizens. After the humiliating experience of living
in the South during Jim Crow, I have paid my dues.
It
is clear that there is a cover-up occurring of this scandal, not only to hide
the racist conduct of San Jose city officials, but also to hide the fact that
the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and many district courts within the circuit
are engaging in a huge case fixing scheme. It is my hope that you will take
advantage of the small window of opportunity that’s left to address my
complaints, otherwise, I will make good on my promise to take care of this
matter in my own way. Please read the enclosed documents, especially the letter
and attachments I sent to Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Chief Judge Sidney R.
Thomas. They prove without a doubt that the judgments in my cases are void;
that criminal misconduct occurred during the litigation of my cases; and they
contain my demands that must be met in order for this matter to be resolved.
Sincerely,
Frederick
Bates
