Post #59 (December 9, 2019)
I just stumbled on an article in HUFFPOST regarding a letter that Senator Kamala Harris and about 40 Democrats signed that will be sent to the White House demanding that President Trump remove his advisor Stephen Miller over leaked emails the Senators say exhibit white nationalist views. The letter state that Miller is unfit to serve in any capacity at the White House, let alone as a senior policy advisor. Just when I think it's not possible to have a lower opinion of the Democrats because of their phony outrage when they think someone, almost always a Republican, is a racist, this letter pops up.
Let me make it clear that this post is intended to point out the hypocrisy of two of the Senators that signed this ridiculous letter. I'm not saying that I endorse a white supremacist or white nationalist serving in the White House or any other position in government. One of the reasons should be obvious if you continue reading this post. The hypocrisy of the two Senators I'm calling out is that of Senator Harris and Senator Feinstein. I have written letters to both asking for an investigation into a case-fixing scandal involving Mayor Sam Liccardo and other San Jose city officials in collusion with officials of the US District Court and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals during the litigation of two lawsuits I filed against the City of San Jose for racial and disability discrimination. I am black/African American. See, I told you it should be obvious that I don't give a damn about white nationalists or white supremacists.
During the litigation of my two lawsuits, the courts named above and the City of San Jose conspired to deprive me of several of my rights, and they accomplished this by creating fraudulent documents, falsifying docket entries, making false stipulations, and conducting a phony hearing with fraudulent civil minutes and transcript. The specific crimes they committed include subornation of perjury and perjury, bribery, conspiracy, fraud, and obstruction of justice. The specific intent of these cowards were to humiliate me, deprive me of my constitutional rights, cause me emotional pain and suffering and financial loss. It's all true. If you read many of my prior posts you will see more details, but there will be another link at the end of this post that will present the indisputable facts and evidence that was also presented to Senator Harris and Feinstein.
This letter by Senator Harris and the Democrats demanding Stephen Miller be removed as an advisor to the President appears to be nothing more than a political stunt by Senator Harris to remain relevant and bolster her chances to become the VP candidate for the Democratic Party. I am not aware of any accusations that Miller knowingly and intentionally violated a black person's rights and conspired with the courts in committing criminal acts to cover it up. Senators Harris and Feinstein are aware of these same accusations I am making against San Jose city officials and the courts. Yet, Feinstein and Harris refuse to take any action on an obvious high tech lynching of a black person, while asking for the removal of a presidential advisor for possible white nationalist views. It seems to me if you cover up a high tech lynching of a black person, maybe you are the one that's unfit to serve in any capacity. Just as they did with her campaign for President, Americans should reject this politically motivated stunt by Senator Harris as an act of blatant hypocrisy. Below is a copy of a complaint I made with the Senate Ethics Committee against Senator Harris, Senator Feinstein, Senator Lindsey Graham, and Senator Chuck Grassley for their cover-up the misconduct by San Jose city officials and the courts:
Frederick Bates
----------------
Folsom,
CA 95630
(408) ------------
July
10, 2019
U.S.
Senate Select Committee on Ethics
220
Hart Building
United
States Senate
Washington,
DC 20510
Re:
Ethics Violations by Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee/Petition for
Redress of Grievance
Dear
Members of the Senate Select Committee on Ethics:
The purpose of this letter is to
bring to your attention ethics violations by the following members of the Senate
Judiciary Committee: Senator Lindsey Graham, Senator Chuck Grassley, Senator
Dianne Feinstein, and Senator Kamala Harris. I am also asking that the Select
Committee on Ethics open an investigation into my allegation. My allegation
that the just named Senators violated Senate Ethics Rules are based on their
failure to take action on complaint letters I submitted to each detailing
criminal misconduct by San Jose city officials, officials with the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of California – San Jose Division and
the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals during litigation of two lawsuits I filed
against the City of San Jose for racial and disability discrimination. I am
black/African American. Furthermore, the rulings of the courts in each of my
lawsuits are biased in favor of the City of San Jose and they are wholly
inconsistent with the indisputable facts and well established law.
On the website of the Senate Select
Committee on Ethics under Constituent Service, it states that the First Amendment
of the U.S. Constitution “guarantees the right of the people…to petition the
government for a redress of grievances.” It also states that responding to
inquiries of petitioners and assisting them before executive or independent
government officials and agencies is an appropriate exercise of the
representational function of each Member of Congress, as well as an important
function of congressional oversight. The definition of redress by
Merriam-Webster is to set right or remedy an unjust or unfair situation.
Not only has there been no action
taken on my complaint letters to Senators Graham, Feinstein, Grassley, and
Harris, I have only received a response from Senator Feinstein acknowledging
receipt of my letter. This is inconsistent with the obligation of elected
officials to respond to inquiries of petitioners as noted above. What makes
this matter so egregious is that the accused Senators are making a conscious
decision to conceal from the public the criminal misconduct of San Jose city
officials and officials with the U.S. District Court and the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals that was perpetrated in order to cover up racism, bigotry and
corruption.
Also on the website for the Senate
Select Committee it states that the general advice of the Ethics Committee
concerning pending court actions is that Senate offices should refrain from
intervening in such legal actions in most cases until the matter has reached a
resolution in the
Page 2
courts.
In other words, the judicial system should be allowed to function without
interference from outside sources. It is important to note that there are no
pending actions in court relative to my two lawsuits because the courts have
entered their final judgments. Nothing precludes Congress or the Senate
Judiciary Committee from conducting investigations into my allegations against
the courts based on Congress’ constitutional authority/obligation to provide
oversight. It is important to keep in mind that my allegations against the
courts and the City of San Jose involve very serious criminal misconduct. The criminal misconduct I am alleging includes
bribery, conspiracy to obstruct justice and obstruction of justice, subornation
of perjury and perjury, fraud, and witness tampering. These criminal acts
involve creating a false document relative to a fraudulent stipulation of
dismissal, falsifying court records, staging a phony hearing on a motion I
filed and creating a fraudulent transcript and civil minutes for that hearing
that contradict each other.
In order to support my allegations
of criminal misconduct by San Jose city officials and the courts are two
attachments in pdf format on a flash drive that’s included in this packet. One
attachment contain copies of a letter and documents sent to Inspector General
Michael Horowitz alleging that former Attorney General Jeff Sessions and F.B.I.
Director Christopher Wray, along with several other officials in the Department
of Justice and F.B.I. are engaged in a cover-up of the criminal misconduct of
San Jose city officials and federal court officials. The other attachment
contains copies of a letter and documents I sent to Chief Judge Sidney R.
Thomas of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that is undeniable proof that the
judgments in my two lawsuits against the City of San Jose are based on fraud;
and that they are in violation of the Constitution and well established
precedent and statutory law. The judgments are by law null and void. Yet, the
courts refuse to vacate them. Also on the flash drive are copies of the
complaint letters I sent to Senators Graham, Feinstein, Grassley, and Harris;
along with copies of complaint letters I sent to Speaker of the House Nancy
Pelosi, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, House Intelligence
Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, and Attorney General William Barr.
The conduct of San Jose city
officials and federal court officials is an egregious abuse of power that
violates the public trust. What makes their conduct truly appalling is that
their intent is to cover up racism and bigotry. The evidence of racism by San
Jose city officials is indisputable because they state in court papers that the
City’s anti-discrimination policies did not protect me, a black person, and
that they had no duty to investigate my racial discrimination complaints
against City officials. Even though San Jose city policy specifically states
that discrimination complaints will be investigated, the courts ruled in favor
of the City. It is worthy to note that state law and precedent also establish
that City officials had a duty to investigate my discrimination complaints, and
that they can be held liable individually under Section 1983 based on their
deliberate indifference. Further evidence of bias by the courts and
indifference to the City’s racist conduct is that the court in one proceeding
exhibited hostility toward my discrimination lawsuit by asking why I was making
this a federal case and why I didn’t just drop the darn thing (my lawsuit). Bias
is also indicated by the fact that the courts ruled in favor of the City in my
first lawsuit despite City officials’ admission that they had violated City
policy and a state law that implicates a constitutionally protected interest. This
flagrant bias against me by the courts also makes the judgments in my lawsuits
null and void. I want to make it clear
that I am alleging that Senator Graham, Senator Grassley, Senator Feinstein,
and Senator Harris are
Page
3
intentionally
covering up this matter. It is sufficiently clear that these Senators are in
violation of the Ethic Rules of the Senate, as well as, the oath they took to
protect and uphold the Constitution. A credible criminal case for collusion and
obstruction of justice can also be made against these Senators because the
intentional cover-up of a crime is in itself a crime. An investigation into
this matter is warranted in order to protect the integrity of our judicial
system and to set right this unjust situation. Please inform me of what action
the Senate Select Committee will take in regards to my allegation.
Sincerely,
Frederick
Bates
More details can be seen here:
