Post #55 (July 24, 2019)
I'm not going to tell anyone who to vote for or what party to support. I have already stated in prior posts that I have no preference for neither the Democratic Party nor the Republican Party. As far as I'm concerned, they are on the same page when it come to corruption. Both parties are corrupt to their cores and they care nothing about the rights of the American people. I also stated in prior posts that I believe that public corruption is the greatest threat to democracy, not Donald Trump, not the Russians, not Iran or North Korea, and not China. Now all this could change in the blink of an eye. But as we stand today, it's crooked and corrupt government officials elected and appointed that pose the greatest existential threat to Democracy and the Constitution which is the foundation for our rule of law. I know some smarty pants out there is going to point out my apparent inconsistent statement because obviously Trump is an elected official. The reason Trump is less of a threat to democracy and the Constitution than other government officials is the abundance of oversight that is exercised over all of his actions. Nearly everything he does is met with resistance by the Democrats and the mainstream media or by a court challenge from progressive leaning groups. No other officials in our government come close to getting the same oversight as President Trump.
Now about this spectacle that went on in Washington, DC today that was the Mueller Hearing. We all know about Mueller's probe into possible collusion between the Trump Administration and the Russians during the past presidential election, and allegations that Trump attempted to obstruct Mueller's investigation. For the life of me, I can't understand why the Democrats continue to push this nonsense surrounding Mueller's probe. Democrats have no shame and no honor when it comes to their desire to build a case for impeaching President Trump. It's no wonder the Bible warns against hate. Hate is truly a bad thing, and the Democrats are a prime example of how bad it is to be full of hate. They have become totally irrational, unhinged, deranged and consumed behind Mueller's investigation which found that there was no collusion between Trump and the Russians. All Democrats have left is a possible obstruction case that is weak at best.
First of all, it was clear during the Obama Administration that there was no collusion between Trump and the Russians, and that Russia's attempt at meddling in our election had no impact on the outcome of the election. Let us use some commonsense here. There were several investigations by intelligence officials, Congress, and the FBI into this matter. Not a single piece of evidence was uncovered that Trump or any members of his campaign colluded. There was absolutely no need for a Special Counsel investigation. The Special Counsel was appointed only after FBI Director James Comey was fired and he leaked a letter to the press suggesting that Trump had tried to obstruct justice in the Michael Flynn case. If Comey had not been fired, we would not have had to suffer through Mueller's investigation and all of the spectacles attendant to it; namely the testimony of Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen, Attorney General William Barr, and now Robert Mueller himself. Plain and simple, the Mueller investigation was a farce and was retaliation for the firing of James Comey by Trump.
I stated in a post on June 6, 2019 that there could not be a lawful obstruction case brought against Trump because the underlying investigation is based on fraud and justice was never the intent. I compared an obstruction case against Trump to the case of a police officer making an unlawful arrest. A person can't be charged lawfully for resisting an unlawful arrest. That is just the truth. It's not about whether you like or dislike Donald Trump. This is about being honest with yourself and saying what is right. The Democrats continue to make fools of themselves by conducting this hearing today before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees for the purpose of gathering evidence for impeachment. The hearing today was unnecessary because Mueller stated that he would only testify to what was in his report. There was nothing new to gain in the way of evidence against Trump. Mueller pretty much kept his word and stuck to what was in his report during his testimony. The hearing made for good political theater but produced no significant new evidence that favors impeachment for obstruction of justice. As I just pointed out, any case brought against Trump for obstruction would be moot from the standpoint that the underlying investigation was not legit. Fraud vitiates everything!
I believe the Democrats are making fools of themselves for other reasons. It is clear from their tolerance for prior cases of obstruction of justice that their obsession with the weak obstruction case against the President is politically motivated and insincere. I gave two such examples of solid obstruction of justice cases in my post on June 6, 2019 that the Democrats were unwilling to call for any prosecution or accountability. One case involved the Hillary Clinton email scandal. You would be hard pressed to find a more flagrant case of obstruction of justice. The evidence was quite compelling: thirty thousand emails deleted that were under subpoena, computer hard drives were wipe clean, and communication devices containing material evidence were smashed to bits. Destroying evidence in a criminal investigation is classic obstruction of justice. Yet, the same Democrats were quick to defend Clinton; and they now want to impeach Trump for far less reprehensible conduct than Clinton. The second case I mentioned in my post on June 6, 2019 involves a conspiracy by Democrats and Republicans to cover up an obstruction of justice and case-fixing scheme involving several San Jose city officials, officials with the US District Court in San Jose and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The Democrats who are now seeking to impeach Trump have failed to call for an investigation into the egregious conduct of San Jose city officials and federal court officials. The Democrats would be wise to think twice before proceeding with this foolhardy impeachment nonsense.
Thursday, July 25, 2019
Tuesday, June 25, 2019
Democrats' Problem With Impeachment
Post 54 (6/25/19)
Lately, I haven't heard much coming from the Democratic leadership in Congress about impeaching President Trump. What is going on? A few weeks ago all you heard from many of the Democrats was how Trump deserved to be impeached based on his obstructive conduct during the Mueller Investigation. I think we all are familiar with Trump's alleged misconduct documented in Mueller's report. I don't have to state it here. I have already stated in prior posts in this blog why I believe impeachment is not a good idea. You will also find in many of my prior posts that I bash the Democrats for their hypocrisy and dishonesty. There is a good reason for my Democrat bashing. They deserve it. To her credit, Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House, has always stated that she was against impeachment. However, many other leading Democrats in Congress were initially very enthusiastic about this impeachment nonsense. This enthusiasm seems to have tapered off. Democrats like Senators Cory Booker and Kamala Harris, members of the Senate Judiciary Committee; along with House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff have all been very forceful in their support for the impeachment of President Trump. The reasons given for impeachment range from holding the President accountable for his crimes, Congress' obligation under the Constitution to exercise oversight of the President and because of the notion that no one is above the law. Now these would all be good reasons to impeach Trumps if in fact his conduct reached the high standard for impeachment set by the Constitution that requires treason, bribery or high crimes and misdemeanors. Just as I believed with Bill Clinton, I don't think the constitutional standard is met with Trump's conduct. I have said this before and I am saying it again. My position on impeachment and my condemnation of the Democrats' hysteria surrounding Trump's conduct should not be taken as my support for Trump. The Democrats are all about putting on a show for the media and for their base of Trump haters. They should not be taken serious about anything, clearly not about impeachment.
As I note in the title of this post, the Democrats have a huge problem with impeachment. Many of the top Democrats in Congress, Speaker Pelosi, Senators Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff are part of a criminal conspiracy by members of Congress to obstruct justice by covering-up several felonies committed by San Jose city officials and several federal court officials during litigation of two racial and disability discrimination lawsuits I filed against the City of San Jose. I am black/African American. It is the misconduct of the Democrats that I just mentioned that rises to the constitutional standard for impeachment, high crimes and misdemeanors. It is they who are more deserving of impeachment than President Trump. Speaker Pelosi, Senators Feinstein and Harris, Congressmen Nadler and Schiff all received letters from me asking that the Senate and House Judiciary Committees open investigations into my allegations against San Jose city officials and the federal courts. No investigation has been opened, even though I presented each with incontrovertible facts and evidence to support my allegations. The facts and evidence I presented prove without a shadow of doubt that San Jose city officials conspired with my attorney and the courts to falsify court records, create false documents, and stage a phony hearing on a motion I filed. A fraudulent transcript and civil minutes were then created for that hearing. At least one city official and my attorney was bribed for their participation. In addition to the criminal acts committed, the courts failed to follow several federal statutes and binding precedent while making rulings in favor of the City of San Jose in both of my lawsuits.
The Democratic leadership in Congress should be very careful with how they handle this move to impeach President Trump based on the impeachable offenses they are committing by covering up the very egregious conduct of the City of San Jose, the US District Court and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Not only would they look like hypocrites if they impeach Trump, there could be political and legal ramifications for them as well for their criminal cover-up. They should be aware that I have no intent of allowing this scandal to simply be ignored. They have reason to worry.
Lately, I haven't heard much coming from the Democratic leadership in Congress about impeaching President Trump. What is going on? A few weeks ago all you heard from many of the Democrats was how Trump deserved to be impeached based on his obstructive conduct during the Mueller Investigation. I think we all are familiar with Trump's alleged misconduct documented in Mueller's report. I don't have to state it here. I have already stated in prior posts in this blog why I believe impeachment is not a good idea. You will also find in many of my prior posts that I bash the Democrats for their hypocrisy and dishonesty. There is a good reason for my Democrat bashing. They deserve it. To her credit, Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House, has always stated that she was against impeachment. However, many other leading Democrats in Congress were initially very enthusiastic about this impeachment nonsense. This enthusiasm seems to have tapered off. Democrats like Senators Cory Booker and Kamala Harris, members of the Senate Judiciary Committee; along with House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff have all been very forceful in their support for the impeachment of President Trump. The reasons given for impeachment range from holding the President accountable for his crimes, Congress' obligation under the Constitution to exercise oversight of the President and because of the notion that no one is above the law. Now these would all be good reasons to impeach Trumps if in fact his conduct reached the high standard for impeachment set by the Constitution that requires treason, bribery or high crimes and misdemeanors. Just as I believed with Bill Clinton, I don't think the constitutional standard is met with Trump's conduct. I have said this before and I am saying it again. My position on impeachment and my condemnation of the Democrats' hysteria surrounding Trump's conduct should not be taken as my support for Trump. The Democrats are all about putting on a show for the media and for their base of Trump haters. They should not be taken serious about anything, clearly not about impeachment.
As I note in the title of this post, the Democrats have a huge problem with impeachment. Many of the top Democrats in Congress, Speaker Pelosi, Senators Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff are part of a criminal conspiracy by members of Congress to obstruct justice by covering-up several felonies committed by San Jose city officials and several federal court officials during litigation of two racial and disability discrimination lawsuits I filed against the City of San Jose. I am black/African American. It is the misconduct of the Democrats that I just mentioned that rises to the constitutional standard for impeachment, high crimes and misdemeanors. It is they who are more deserving of impeachment than President Trump. Speaker Pelosi, Senators Feinstein and Harris, Congressmen Nadler and Schiff all received letters from me asking that the Senate and House Judiciary Committees open investigations into my allegations against San Jose city officials and the federal courts. No investigation has been opened, even though I presented each with incontrovertible facts and evidence to support my allegations. The facts and evidence I presented prove without a shadow of doubt that San Jose city officials conspired with my attorney and the courts to falsify court records, create false documents, and stage a phony hearing on a motion I filed. A fraudulent transcript and civil minutes were then created for that hearing. At least one city official and my attorney was bribed for their participation. In addition to the criminal acts committed, the courts failed to follow several federal statutes and binding precedent while making rulings in favor of the City of San Jose in both of my lawsuits.
The Democratic leadership in Congress should be very careful with how they handle this move to impeach President Trump based on the impeachable offenses they are committing by covering up the very egregious conduct of the City of San Jose, the US District Court and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Not only would they look like hypocrites if they impeach Trump, there could be political and legal ramifications for them as well for their criminal cover-up. They should be aware that I have no intent of allowing this scandal to simply be ignored. They have reason to worry.
Thursday, June 6, 2019
The Liars' Club
Post 53
YOU CAN'T OBSTRUCT JUSTICE WHEN THERE IS NO JUSTICE TO OBSTRUCT
Just when you think you've seen it all when it come to hatred for Donald Trump, you get this statement supposedly signed by several hundred former federal prosecutors stating that they believe the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice. These former prosecutors, if in fact they are former prosecutors, are all big liars. This ridiculous statement has zero credibility from the word go. I know a solid one half of the country, maybe more, will buy into this false narrative being pushed by these presumed to be former prosecutors. At least one Republican Congressman has joined the Democrats in support of this lie. But I am going to completely destroy their claim with facts that are hard to dispute.
I'm no big fan of the President. But I don't hate him. I was no big fan of Hillary Clinton. But I don't hate her. I'm no fan of Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats. But I don't hate them. I'm no fan of Lindsey Graham and the Republicans. But I don't hate them. Here is the point I'm painstakingly trying to make. I don't take sides when it comes to politicians and government officials. I am a tribe of one. I only take the side of what I believe is right. My response to this statement purportedly made by these persons claiming to be former federal prosecutors is not about defending or showing support for Trump. It is about exposing the lack of integrity and honesty of these so called former prosecutors.
As I promised, I'm going to destroy the ridiculous claim by these so called former prosecutors that any other person that's not President Trump would be indicted on multiple charges for obstruction of justice. The basis of their claim is that the Mueller report describes several acts that satisfy all the elements for an obstruction charge: conduct that obstructed or attempted to obstruct the truth-finding process, as to which the evidence of corrupt intent and connection to pending proceedings is overwhelming.
Here's where the false narrative falls apart. First and foremost, it is not possible from a legal standpoint to obstruct justice during an investigation that's illegitimate, and is based on fraud and justice was never the intent. It is similar from a legal standpoint that you can't be guilty of resisting an arrest that is unlawful. I could rest my case now, but the best is yet to come. Doesn't these so called former prosecutors remember the Hillary Clinton email investigation? After she was issued a subpoena to preserve evidence, she deleted over thirty thousand emails, destroyed computer hard drives and other communications devices with the clear intent to obstruct the truth-finding process. I think the chances are one hundred percent that there was classified information in those deleted emails and communication devices that were destroyed. The evidence of her corrupt intent and the connection to a pending proceeding was overwhelming and indisputable. Since Hillary Clinton was a person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, why wasn't she indicted? The fact that Clinton wasn't indicted discredits the claim that any other person would have been charged under similar circumstances described in Mueller's report. The case for obstruction against Clinton was a lot stronger than the case for obstruction against Trump. Yet, over half of the voters and all of the Democratic elected officials in Congress were willing to elect her President. Now you have a significant number of Democratic Members of Congress wanting to impeach Trump for conduct far less reprehensible than Clinton's. I could rest my case here, but I'm not; because the evidence that proves that these so-called former prosecutors are liars gets even better.
Beginning in 2014, long before there was a Trump Presidency, I filed a complaint with the Department of Justice and the F.B.I. against San Jose city officials and officials with the U.S. District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals based on their conduct during the litigation of a lawsuit I filed against the City that obstructed justice. The evidence that these officials obstructed justice is extensive and demonstrates a total disregard for the judicial process and the rule of law. Now keep in mind the elements of an obstruction charge according to the so-called former prosecutors: conduct that obstructed or attempted to obstruct the truth-finding process. During litigation of my lawsuit, the City of San Jose ("City") and the U.S. District Court in San Jose conspired to obstruct the truth-finding process. Two City officials were told to lie under oath during their depositions. They, in fact, told several lies on material issues during their depositions. The District Court essentially ordered the City to file a motion for summary judgment that was a total fabrication. The City was allowed to enter into a fraudulent agreement with my attorney, who received a quid pro quo, to dismiss a defendant that clearly violated my rights. The purpose of this dismissal was to prevent the court from ruling on the discriminatory acts of the defendant and his superior. The facts alleged in the City's motion for summary judgment were not only false, they contradicted the true facts the City had already admitted to in it's answer to my complaint/lawsuit. To put it plain and simple, the District Court told the City to lie in it's motion for summary judgment, and to enter the fraudulent stipulation of dismissal with my attorney. Of course, the City's motion was granted by the District Court. Now how's that for obstructing the truth-finding process? But there's a lot more. After I filed my own motion under FRCP Rule 60 seeking relief from the judgment of the District Court based on the fraud that was perpetrated, the District Court and the City further obstructed justice by falsifying several docket entries by falsely stating that my motion was contesting the court costs awarded to the City, instead of fraud. I was told by a court official on two different occasions that there would be no hearing on my motion; and that my motion would be decided on the papers filed by me and the City. In clear contradiction of what I was told, a hearing was held on my motion without my knowledge. During the hearing, the City was granted a motion to dismiss because I failed to appear for the hearing, even though, I was told specifically that I did not have to appear for the hearing. The word for word account of the City's motion to dismiss was left out of the transcript of the hearing. The City's motion to dismiss supposedly made during the hearing is a complete mystery. The civil minutes reflects that something totally different happened during the hearing on my motion when compared to the transcript. The civil minutes reflects that the court ruled during the hearing that it would deny my motion and submit a written order at a later date. It is indisputable that the conduct of San Jose city officials and officials with the U.S. District Court as described above meets and exceeds the elements for an obstruction charge outlined in the statement of these so called former prosecutors.Yet, my complaints to the Department of Justice , the F.B.I, and the U.S. Attorney's Offices in San Francisco and San Jose have not been investigated, have not resulted in any indictments, nor have I received a response stating why there hasn't been any action taken on my complaints.
What has been presented here are the incontrovertible facts that discredit the claim by these so called former prosecutors that the conduct of President Trump as described by Mueller would have resulted in an indictment for any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President.These alleged former prosecutors are Trump haters and members of the Liars' Club with an ax to grind. For me, it's not about Trump, Clinton, the Democrats or Republicans. The reason I'm responding to this lie by these claiming to be former prosecutors is that I expected that, as a black person that grew up in the South during Jim Crow and the Civil Rights era, the federal courts would protect my constitutional rights. This has been the farthest thing from the truth. What happened to me when I sued the City of San Jose for violating my rights based on my race and disability is a disgrace. As I described above, City officials and officials in the U.S. District Court went out of their way to obstruct the truth-finding process with the corrupt intent to obstruct justice by covering up the racism and bigotry of the City. Not only am I angered by the false statement by these so called former prosecutors, I'm deeply offended as well. I now rest my case. For more information, refer to my prior posts and my facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/groups/624131267713226/
YOU CAN'T OBSTRUCT JUSTICE WHEN THERE IS NO JUSTICE TO OBSTRUCT
Just when you think you've seen it all when it come to hatred for Donald Trump, you get this statement supposedly signed by several hundred former federal prosecutors stating that they believe the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice. These former prosecutors, if in fact they are former prosecutors, are all big liars. This ridiculous statement has zero credibility from the word go. I know a solid one half of the country, maybe more, will buy into this false narrative being pushed by these presumed to be former prosecutors. At least one Republican Congressman has joined the Democrats in support of this lie. But I am going to completely destroy their claim with facts that are hard to dispute.
I'm no big fan of the President. But I don't hate him. I was no big fan of Hillary Clinton. But I don't hate her. I'm no fan of Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats. But I don't hate them. I'm no fan of Lindsey Graham and the Republicans. But I don't hate them. Here is the point I'm painstakingly trying to make. I don't take sides when it comes to politicians and government officials. I am a tribe of one. I only take the side of what I believe is right. My response to this statement purportedly made by these persons claiming to be former federal prosecutors is not about defending or showing support for Trump. It is about exposing the lack of integrity and honesty of these so called former prosecutors.
As I promised, I'm going to destroy the ridiculous claim by these so called former prosecutors that any other person that's not President Trump would be indicted on multiple charges for obstruction of justice. The basis of their claim is that the Mueller report describes several acts that satisfy all the elements for an obstruction charge: conduct that obstructed or attempted to obstruct the truth-finding process, as to which the evidence of corrupt intent and connection to pending proceedings is overwhelming.
Here's where the false narrative falls apart. First and foremost, it is not possible from a legal standpoint to obstruct justice during an investigation that's illegitimate, and is based on fraud and justice was never the intent. It is similar from a legal standpoint that you can't be guilty of resisting an arrest that is unlawful. I could rest my case now, but the best is yet to come. Doesn't these so called former prosecutors remember the Hillary Clinton email investigation? After she was issued a subpoena to preserve evidence, she deleted over thirty thousand emails, destroyed computer hard drives and other communications devices with the clear intent to obstruct the truth-finding process. I think the chances are one hundred percent that there was classified information in those deleted emails and communication devices that were destroyed. The evidence of her corrupt intent and the connection to a pending proceeding was overwhelming and indisputable. Since Hillary Clinton was a person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, why wasn't she indicted? The fact that Clinton wasn't indicted discredits the claim that any other person would have been charged under similar circumstances described in Mueller's report. The case for obstruction against Clinton was a lot stronger than the case for obstruction against Trump. Yet, over half of the voters and all of the Democratic elected officials in Congress were willing to elect her President. Now you have a significant number of Democratic Members of Congress wanting to impeach Trump for conduct far less reprehensible than Clinton's. I could rest my case here, but I'm not; because the evidence that proves that these so-called former prosecutors are liars gets even better.
Beginning in 2014, long before there was a Trump Presidency, I filed a complaint with the Department of Justice and the F.B.I. against San Jose city officials and officials with the U.S. District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals based on their conduct during the litigation of a lawsuit I filed against the City that obstructed justice. The evidence that these officials obstructed justice is extensive and demonstrates a total disregard for the judicial process and the rule of law. Now keep in mind the elements of an obstruction charge according to the so-called former prosecutors: conduct that obstructed or attempted to obstruct the truth-finding process. During litigation of my lawsuit, the City of San Jose ("City") and the U.S. District Court in San Jose conspired to obstruct the truth-finding process. Two City officials were told to lie under oath during their depositions. They, in fact, told several lies on material issues during their depositions. The District Court essentially ordered the City to file a motion for summary judgment that was a total fabrication. The City was allowed to enter into a fraudulent agreement with my attorney, who received a quid pro quo, to dismiss a defendant that clearly violated my rights. The purpose of this dismissal was to prevent the court from ruling on the discriminatory acts of the defendant and his superior. The facts alleged in the City's motion for summary judgment were not only false, they contradicted the true facts the City had already admitted to in it's answer to my complaint/lawsuit. To put it plain and simple, the District Court told the City to lie in it's motion for summary judgment, and to enter the fraudulent stipulation of dismissal with my attorney. Of course, the City's motion was granted by the District Court. Now how's that for obstructing the truth-finding process? But there's a lot more. After I filed my own motion under FRCP Rule 60 seeking relief from the judgment of the District Court based on the fraud that was perpetrated, the District Court and the City further obstructed justice by falsifying several docket entries by falsely stating that my motion was contesting the court costs awarded to the City, instead of fraud. I was told by a court official on two different occasions that there would be no hearing on my motion; and that my motion would be decided on the papers filed by me and the City. In clear contradiction of what I was told, a hearing was held on my motion without my knowledge. During the hearing, the City was granted a motion to dismiss because I failed to appear for the hearing, even though, I was told specifically that I did not have to appear for the hearing. The word for word account of the City's motion to dismiss was left out of the transcript of the hearing. The City's motion to dismiss supposedly made during the hearing is a complete mystery. The civil minutes reflects that something totally different happened during the hearing on my motion when compared to the transcript. The civil minutes reflects that the court ruled during the hearing that it would deny my motion and submit a written order at a later date. It is indisputable that the conduct of San Jose city officials and officials with the U.S. District Court as described above meets and exceeds the elements for an obstruction charge outlined in the statement of these so called former prosecutors.Yet, my complaints to the Department of Justice , the F.B.I, and the U.S. Attorney's Offices in San Francisco and San Jose have not been investigated, have not resulted in any indictments, nor have I received a response stating why there hasn't been any action taken on my complaints.
What has been presented here are the incontrovertible facts that discredit the claim by these so called former prosecutors that the conduct of President Trump as described by Mueller would have resulted in an indictment for any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President.These alleged former prosecutors are Trump haters and members of the Liars' Club with an ax to grind. For me, it's not about Trump, Clinton, the Democrats or Republicans. The reason I'm responding to this lie by these claiming to be former prosecutors is that I expected that, as a black person that grew up in the South during Jim Crow and the Civil Rights era, the federal courts would protect my constitutional rights. This has been the farthest thing from the truth. What happened to me when I sued the City of San Jose for violating my rights based on my race and disability is a disgrace. As I described above, City officials and officials in the U.S. District Court went out of their way to obstruct the truth-finding process with the corrupt intent to obstruct justice by covering up the racism and bigotry of the City. Not only am I angered by the false statement by these so called former prosecutors, I'm deeply offended as well. I now rest my case. For more information, refer to my prior posts and my facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/groups/624131267713226/
Tuesday, June 4, 2019
It's Public Corruption Stupid!
Post 29/29 - February 21, 2018
This past Friday (2/16/18), a grand jury, at the request of Special Counsel Robert Meuller, indicted 13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies for meddling in the past presidential election through the use of social media.Those indictments appears to be nothing more than a political statement and publicity stunt that's meant to distract attention from the many scandals now plaguing the FBI and DOJ. There is a very slim chance that the Russians will be brought to trial on any of the charges in the indictments because it is unlikely they will be extradited to this country. Yet, many members of Congress and the media were pleased to learn about the indictments. It's unbelievable that many of them continue to express outrage at Russia's meddling into our election when all of the evidence presented so far shows that it had little to no impact on the outcome of the election. Their support of Meuller's investigation is based on the belief that we were attacked by the Russians when they interfered in our election. There is also support by some because it puts Trump in the hot seat. As for me, I'm highly suspicious about the Meuller investigation. It was started when fired FBI director James Comey leaked a memo to the media suggesting that Trump tried to shut down the investigation into fired NSA director Michael Flynn. Comey even admits that he leaked the memo in order that a special counsel would be appointed. Had Comey not been fired, there would be no special counsel investigation into possible Trump-Russia collusion. Because the investigation appears to be in retaliation for the Comey firing, it does not excite me at all, even though I believe that Comey should not have been fired. The big question for me is why was there no concern from politicians and the media about Trump colluding with the Russians prior to him firing Comey?
To me, it has always been dubious that Russia's meddling posed such a great threat to our democracy. I wrote a post on July 31, 2017 and another one on August 26, 2017 explaining my position that this scandal might be overblown and that there were other threats to our democracy greater than Russia's interference in our past presidential election. Some of you might remember the slogan from one of former president Bill Clinton's campaigns stating "t's the economy stupid." So if you ask me what is a greater threat to our democracy than the Russian interference in our past election, "It's public corruption stupid."
This past Friday (2/16/18), a grand jury, at the request of Special Counsel Robert Meuller, indicted 13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies for meddling in the past presidential election through the use of social media.Those indictments appears to be nothing more than a political statement and publicity stunt that's meant to distract attention from the many scandals now plaguing the FBI and DOJ. There is a very slim chance that the Russians will be brought to trial on any of the charges in the indictments because it is unlikely they will be extradited to this country. Yet, many members of Congress and the media were pleased to learn about the indictments. It's unbelievable that many of them continue to express outrage at Russia's meddling into our election when all of the evidence presented so far shows that it had little to no impact on the outcome of the election. Their support of Meuller's investigation is based on the belief that we were attacked by the Russians when they interfered in our election. There is also support by some because it puts Trump in the hot seat. As for me, I'm highly suspicious about the Meuller investigation. It was started when fired FBI director James Comey leaked a memo to the media suggesting that Trump tried to shut down the investigation into fired NSA director Michael Flynn. Comey even admits that he leaked the memo in order that a special counsel would be appointed. Had Comey not been fired, there would be no special counsel investigation into possible Trump-Russia collusion. Because the investigation appears to be in retaliation for the Comey firing, it does not excite me at all, even though I believe that Comey should not have been fired. The big question for me is why was there no concern from politicians and the media about Trump colluding with the Russians prior to him firing Comey?
To me, it has always been dubious that Russia's meddling posed such a great threat to our democracy. I wrote a post on July 31, 2017 and another one on August 26, 2017 explaining my position that this scandal might be overblown and that there were other threats to our democracy greater than Russia's interference in our past presidential election. Some of you might remember the slogan from one of former president Bill Clinton's campaigns stating "t's the economy stupid." So if you ask me what is a greater threat to our democracy than the Russian interference in our past election, "It's public corruption stupid."
Friday, May 10, 2019
Joe Biden Is Running A Shameful Campaign About Race
Post 52
Recently former Vice-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, entered the race for President. If you know anything about politics, you are aware that the former VP was a long time Senator from Delaware. I have no personal ill will toward Joe Biden. He seems like a nice enough guy. It is clear though that Biden's campaign will try to paint Trump as a racist and also focus on his character. When Biden released a video a few weeks ago announcing that he was running for president, he talked about Charlottesville and Trump's response to the violence that occurred. I have my own take of Trump's response to Charlottesville that's a little different from Joe Biden's. The President's response was appropriate being that he is the Commander-in-Chief. You can view my non-politically motivated take on how the President responded to Charlottesville in my post on September 18, 2017. Biden has also talked about bringing back honesty and dignity to the Office of the President.
Joe Biden is the quintessential politician, willing to say anything to get a vote. His candidacy is not about making this a better country. It is all about defeating Donald Trump at all costs. Biden has spent nearly fifty years in public office. He is far more responsible for the problems we face as a nation than Trump. But it's Biden's hypocrisy that concerns me the most. He talked about bringing dignity and honesty to the Oval Office. Where was all this concern for dignity when his fellow Democrat Bill Clinton was President. Has Biden forgot about the Monica Lewinsky affair and all of the other sexual misconduct allegations against Clinton. As for honesty, Biden apparently has forgotten "I did not have sex with that woman." What about the lies that were told about Obama Care when Biden was VP? If you want your doctor you can keep your doctor. Your insurance premiums will go down. And what about Benghazi? The violence was a spontaneous response to an anti-Islamic video. Biden referred to Trump as being a clown. Hasn't he taken notice of his own party since Trump has been in the White House? Who can forget the clownish manner of the Democrats during the Kavanaugh hearings or during the recent testimony of Attorney General William Barr. You actually had a Democrat member of the House Judiciary Committee eating KFC during the hearing. He also had a fake chicken at a press conference. Now who are the real clowns?
I do not offend easily. But it's the hypocrisy of Joe Biden and the Democrats regarding the issue of race that offends me more than the President and Democrats' clown like behavior. Referring to the President as the Grand Wizard of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, the KKK, and a white supremacist for political gain trivializes one of the darkest moments in our nation's history. It is Biden latest comment during a political rally in South Carolina that has gotten me riled up. During that rally, Biden implied that because of Trump and the Republicans support of voter ID laws, "You've got Jim Crow sneaking back in." This is nonsense. Jim Crow was, among other things, about using intimidation and violence to prevent blacks from registering to vote, and from voting. Requiring a person to have proper ID in order to vote is just as sensible as requiring a person to have proper ID when purchasing a firearm. Biden and the Democrats should remember that it was their party that gave us Jim Crow, and not the Republicans. Democrats should also remember that many in their own party refused to support the 1964 Civil Rights Act that ended Jim Crow.
If Biden wants to blame someone for Jim Crow sneaking back in, he need only to look at members of his own Democratic Party. During the past three years, I have written letters to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Senators Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris, Congressman Adam Schiff and Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren requesting that they open an investigation into a criminal conspiracy between San Jose city officials and officials with the U.S. District Court and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to obstruct justice during the litigation of two lawsuits I filed against the City of San Jose. During litigation, these officials conspired to falsify court records, file fraudulent documents, stage a fake hearing on a motion I filed, fabricate contradictory civil minutes and a transcript for that hearing, and enter several bogus judgments relative to my lawsuits for the purpose of covering up discrimination I suffered at the hands of San Jose city officials based on my race and disability. I am black/African American. Senator Feinstein was the only one that responded to my letter. But she offered no help at all. The conduct of these officials, which showed utter disregard for the rule of law, were so flagrantly discriminatory and racist that I was compelled to start this blog to expose this egregious abuse of power and public corruption. The clear purpose of these officials was to humiliate me, make me feel powerless, cause me financial harm and emotional distress. This is more like Jim Crow than requiring someone to have proper ID to vote.
Joe Biden and the Democrats using race for purely political reasons is divisive and harmful to our country. They are quick to call Trump and Republicans racist, the KKK, white supremacists, and that Jim Crow is sneaking back in. Yet, when presented with a very real case of a black person's rights being violated like this was Jim Crow, they refuse to take any action whatsoever; even in a case where there was serious criminal misconduct. It should be clear that Democrats are not serious about eliminating racism and discrimination, and that they are only using race to gin up hatred for Trump and Republicans. What a shame.
Recently former Vice-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, entered the race for President. If you know anything about politics, you are aware that the former VP was a long time Senator from Delaware. I have no personal ill will toward Joe Biden. He seems like a nice enough guy. It is clear though that Biden's campaign will try to paint Trump as a racist and also focus on his character. When Biden released a video a few weeks ago announcing that he was running for president, he talked about Charlottesville and Trump's response to the violence that occurred. I have my own take of Trump's response to Charlottesville that's a little different from Joe Biden's. The President's response was appropriate being that he is the Commander-in-Chief. You can view my non-politically motivated take on how the President responded to Charlottesville in my post on September 18, 2017. Biden has also talked about bringing back honesty and dignity to the Office of the President.
Joe Biden is the quintessential politician, willing to say anything to get a vote. His candidacy is not about making this a better country. It is all about defeating Donald Trump at all costs. Biden has spent nearly fifty years in public office. He is far more responsible for the problems we face as a nation than Trump. But it's Biden's hypocrisy that concerns me the most. He talked about bringing dignity and honesty to the Oval Office. Where was all this concern for dignity when his fellow Democrat Bill Clinton was President. Has Biden forgot about the Monica Lewinsky affair and all of the other sexual misconduct allegations against Clinton. As for honesty, Biden apparently has forgotten "I did not have sex with that woman." What about the lies that were told about Obama Care when Biden was VP? If you want your doctor you can keep your doctor. Your insurance premiums will go down. And what about Benghazi? The violence was a spontaneous response to an anti-Islamic video. Biden referred to Trump as being a clown. Hasn't he taken notice of his own party since Trump has been in the White House? Who can forget the clownish manner of the Democrats during the Kavanaugh hearings or during the recent testimony of Attorney General William Barr. You actually had a Democrat member of the House Judiciary Committee eating KFC during the hearing. He also had a fake chicken at a press conference. Now who are the real clowns?
I do not offend easily. But it's the hypocrisy of Joe Biden and the Democrats regarding the issue of race that offends me more than the President and Democrats' clown like behavior. Referring to the President as the Grand Wizard of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, the KKK, and a white supremacist for political gain trivializes one of the darkest moments in our nation's history. It is Biden latest comment during a political rally in South Carolina that has gotten me riled up. During that rally, Biden implied that because of Trump and the Republicans support of voter ID laws, "You've got Jim Crow sneaking back in." This is nonsense. Jim Crow was, among other things, about using intimidation and violence to prevent blacks from registering to vote, and from voting. Requiring a person to have proper ID in order to vote is just as sensible as requiring a person to have proper ID when purchasing a firearm. Biden and the Democrats should remember that it was their party that gave us Jim Crow, and not the Republicans. Democrats should also remember that many in their own party refused to support the 1964 Civil Rights Act that ended Jim Crow.
If Biden wants to blame someone for Jim Crow sneaking back in, he need only to look at members of his own Democratic Party. During the past three years, I have written letters to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Senators Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris, Congressman Adam Schiff and Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren requesting that they open an investigation into a criminal conspiracy between San Jose city officials and officials with the U.S. District Court and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to obstruct justice during the litigation of two lawsuits I filed against the City of San Jose. During litigation, these officials conspired to falsify court records, file fraudulent documents, stage a fake hearing on a motion I filed, fabricate contradictory civil minutes and a transcript for that hearing, and enter several bogus judgments relative to my lawsuits for the purpose of covering up discrimination I suffered at the hands of San Jose city officials based on my race and disability. I am black/African American. Senator Feinstein was the only one that responded to my letter. But she offered no help at all. The conduct of these officials, which showed utter disregard for the rule of law, were so flagrantly discriminatory and racist that I was compelled to start this blog to expose this egregious abuse of power and public corruption. The clear purpose of these officials was to humiliate me, make me feel powerless, cause me financial harm and emotional distress. This is more like Jim Crow than requiring someone to have proper ID to vote.
Joe Biden and the Democrats using race for purely political reasons is divisive and harmful to our country. They are quick to call Trump and Republicans racist, the KKK, white supremacists, and that Jim Crow is sneaking back in. Yet, when presented with a very real case of a black person's rights being violated like this was Jim Crow, they refuse to take any action whatsoever; even in a case where there was serious criminal misconduct. It should be clear that Democrats are not serious about eliminating racism and discrimination, and that they are only using race to gin up hatred for Trump and Republicans. What a shame.
Wednesday, April 10, 2019
The College Admissions Scam - All Cheating Scandals Are Not Equal
Post 51
This college admissions scam continues to get a lot of attention now that there are court proceedings taking place. I think anybody that watches the news even a little bit knows the basic details behind this scam. A bunch of rich people, many of them celebrities, conspired with this guy named William "Rick" Singer in an alleged scheme to get their kids admitted into top universities. Part of the scheme consisted of rigging college entrance exams, the SAT and ACT, by having an accomplished test taker either take the entrance exams for the kids or correct the answers on their exams. Another part of the scheme consisted of bribing athletic officials at elite universities to fraudulently recruit kids of wealthy parents into their sports programs as top level athletes.
Now that the criminal cases against many of the parents involved in this scandal are being litigated in court, including the cases against actresses Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman, many of the parents have opted to make deals with prosecutors. Huffman is one of the parents that have made a deal after admitting guilt, whereas, Loughlin has not. Loughlin and her husband, fashion designer J. Mossimo Giannulli, are charged with paying Rick Singer $400,000 to get their daughters admitted to USC as top level athletes in one of the recruiting scams uncovered by the F.B.I. Huffman is accused of paying an accomplice of Singer, Mark Riddell, $15,000 to correct her daughter's answers on the SAT. Huffman is also one of the parents involved in this scandal that have expressed remorse and shame for their actions while Loughlin and other parents have not.
It is clear that the allegations against these parents, Rick Singer, and his accomplice Mark Riddell are very serious and deserves the attention they are getting from the F.B.I. and federal prosecutors. It is understandable that parents that follow the rules when it comes to the college admissions process are angry and upset with parents who use their wealth and celebrity status to undermine the college admissions process by cheating as is alleged here. However, we should not lose sight of the fact that wealth and celebrity have always had its privileges. For sure, I believe these parents should be held accountable if they are found to be guilty of the charges alleged in this scam. However, I wonder if this scandal would be getting the same attention from the media if there were no celebrity defendants involved.
What bothers me, however, is that the F.B.I. and the Department of Justice was quick to take action in this cheating scandal involving members of the public, while at the same time ignoring cheating scandals by government officials that undermine our institutions of government. One such cheating scandal I'm referring to is the subject of this blog that I started for the purpose of exposing it to the public. The scandal involve San Jose city officials, my attorney, and officials with the US District Court in San Jose and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. It involves San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo and members of the San Jose City Council, City Attorney Richard Doyle, and several judges and court officials in the US District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Just as the crimes alleged against Rick Singer, Mark Riddell, and the parents in the college admissions scam, the crimes committed by San Jose city officials, my attorney, and the federal court officials involve fraud, creating false documents, conducting a fake proceeding, misrepresentations, bribery and many other public corruption crimes all relating to cheating and dishonesty. After making several complaints with the F.B.I. and Department of Justice accompanied by indisputable evidence, no investigation or prosecution of these government officials have occurred.
Undermining the college admissions process is serious. But undermining the judicial process is far more egregious because it is a direct attack on an institution of our government. The F.B.I. and federal prosecutors have been aggressive in their pursuit of justice in the college admissions scam while engaging in a massive cover-up of the cheating scandal involving San Jose city officials and officials with the US District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In the eyes of the F.B.I. and the Department of Justice, all cheating scandals are not equal. Some cheaters, such as the San Jose city officials and officials with the federal courts, get special treatment. Many details of the cheating scandal involving San Jose city officials and the courts can be found in my prior posts. However, post #2 on August 23, 2015 is a must read.
This college admissions scam continues to get a lot of attention now that there are court proceedings taking place. I think anybody that watches the news even a little bit knows the basic details behind this scam. A bunch of rich people, many of them celebrities, conspired with this guy named William "Rick" Singer in an alleged scheme to get their kids admitted into top universities. Part of the scheme consisted of rigging college entrance exams, the SAT and ACT, by having an accomplished test taker either take the entrance exams for the kids or correct the answers on their exams. Another part of the scheme consisted of bribing athletic officials at elite universities to fraudulently recruit kids of wealthy parents into their sports programs as top level athletes.
Now that the criminal cases against many of the parents involved in this scandal are being litigated in court, including the cases against actresses Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman, many of the parents have opted to make deals with prosecutors. Huffman is one of the parents that have made a deal after admitting guilt, whereas, Loughlin has not. Loughlin and her husband, fashion designer J. Mossimo Giannulli, are charged with paying Rick Singer $400,000 to get their daughters admitted to USC as top level athletes in one of the recruiting scams uncovered by the F.B.I. Huffman is accused of paying an accomplice of Singer, Mark Riddell, $15,000 to correct her daughter's answers on the SAT. Huffman is also one of the parents involved in this scandal that have expressed remorse and shame for their actions while Loughlin and other parents have not.
It is clear that the allegations against these parents, Rick Singer, and his accomplice Mark Riddell are very serious and deserves the attention they are getting from the F.B.I. and federal prosecutors. It is understandable that parents that follow the rules when it comes to the college admissions process are angry and upset with parents who use their wealth and celebrity status to undermine the college admissions process by cheating as is alleged here. However, we should not lose sight of the fact that wealth and celebrity have always had its privileges. For sure, I believe these parents should be held accountable if they are found to be guilty of the charges alleged in this scam. However, I wonder if this scandal would be getting the same attention from the media if there were no celebrity defendants involved.
What bothers me, however, is that the F.B.I. and the Department of Justice was quick to take action in this cheating scandal involving members of the public, while at the same time ignoring cheating scandals by government officials that undermine our institutions of government. One such cheating scandal I'm referring to is the subject of this blog that I started for the purpose of exposing it to the public. The scandal involve San Jose city officials, my attorney, and officials with the US District Court in San Jose and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. It involves San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo and members of the San Jose City Council, City Attorney Richard Doyle, and several judges and court officials in the US District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Just as the crimes alleged against Rick Singer, Mark Riddell, and the parents in the college admissions scam, the crimes committed by San Jose city officials, my attorney, and the federal court officials involve fraud, creating false documents, conducting a fake proceeding, misrepresentations, bribery and many other public corruption crimes all relating to cheating and dishonesty. After making several complaints with the F.B.I. and Department of Justice accompanied by indisputable evidence, no investigation or prosecution of these government officials have occurred.
Undermining the college admissions process is serious. But undermining the judicial process is far more egregious because it is a direct attack on an institution of our government. The F.B.I. and federal prosecutors have been aggressive in their pursuit of justice in the college admissions scam while engaging in a massive cover-up of the cheating scandal involving San Jose city officials and officials with the US District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In the eyes of the F.B.I. and the Department of Justice, all cheating scandals are not equal. Some cheaters, such as the San Jose city officials and officials with the federal courts, get special treatment. Many details of the cheating scandal involving San Jose city officials and the courts can be found in my prior posts. However, post #2 on August 23, 2015 is a must read.
Thursday, March 28, 2019
The End To The Mueller Investigation Allows The FBI To Focus On Real Collusion And Obstruction of Justice
Post 50
Now that the investigation into possible Trump-Russia collusion during the past presidential election is over, the FBI should now focus on the investigation of cases of collusion and obstruction of justice by government officials that are not motivated by politics. I'm referring to cases where government officials' conduct is so egregious that it shows a wilful and wanton disregard for the truth and the rule of law. I have presented evidence of such a case to the FBI and the Department of Justice for investigation on several different occasions. No investigation has been initiated. The case I am referring to involves a conspiracy between San Jose city officials, my former attorney, and several federal court officials to obstruct justice during lawsuits I filed against the City of San Jose for racial and disability discrimination. I am black/African American. Many of the details of this case have been discussed in some of my prior posts. See my posts on August 23, 2015 and July 31, 2017. The conduct of the involved officials is so reprehensible that some of the details are worth repeating. During litigation in my lawsuits several felonies were committed by my attorney, attorneys for the City of San Jose and several court officials that include judges. Among the crimes these officials committed were conspiracy to obstruct justice and obstruction of justice, perjury and subornation of perjury, bribery and fraud. Details of some of the crimes they committed include falsifying court records, staging a fake hearing on a motion I filed, fabricating a phony transcript and civil minutes for that hearing and fraudulently dismissing an individual defendant from my lawsuit without my knowledge and authorization. Additionally the district court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals entered judgments in my lawsuit that violate statutory law and binding precedent. The judgments are clearly void judgments, but the courts refuse to vacate them. What makes this even more sickening is that all of these officials are officers of the court and the purpose of their misconduct was to hide the bigotry and racism of San Jose city officials directed at me.This is all true. But neither the truth nor the law seem to matter in the Ninth Circuit. Officials involved are either current or former high ranking officials in the City of San Jose and the Ninth Circuit. These officials include San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo, former mayor Chuck Reed, San Jose City Attorney Richard Doyle, retired US District Judge Ronald M. Whyte, US Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins, retired Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals former Chief Judge Alex Kozinski and current Chief Judge Sidney R. Thomas. This scandal is bigger than the college admissions scandal, the Jussie Smollett scandal, the scandal involving the FBI and DOJ relative to the investigation of the Trump campaign, and the Trump-Russia collusion scandal. It is one of the biggest abuses of power and corruption cases in quite some time.
It is reasonable to say that we now have the weakest, most corrupt and ineffective leaders in Congress in the entire history of our once great nation. They have no courage or integrity when it comes to exercising oversight over the rogue and completely out of control Ninth Circuit, as is mandated by the Constitution. It is true folks. Over the past several years, I have made formal complaints with individual members of Congress and the House and Senate Judiciary Committees against the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the US District Court in San Jose. I received only one pathetic response from Senator Dianne Feinstein essentially stating that she had no guts to do anything. At least she had the integrity to respond. Other current members of Congress I sent letters to, Senator Lindsey Graham, Senator Kamala Harris, Senator Chuck Grassley, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, and Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren did not extend me the courtesy of a response.
The Democrats are so quick to exercise oversight of President Trump with endless investigations into all aspects of his life without any suspicion of wrongdoing. Yet, they fail to take any action on indisputable facts and evidence I presented to them that officials within the Ninth Circuit conspired with San Jose city officials to commit several felonies during litigation of my lawsuits against the City. By no means do Democrats have the market cornered on weakness and cowardice when it comes to exercising oversight over the Judicial Branch. The Republicans are just as guilty, notwithstanding their phony claim to be so in love with the Constitution and the rule of law.
Don't be fooled. The Democrats and Republicans are more alike than they are different. All of the phony policy differences are just a game. They are all about obtaining and retaining power. They are all elites who have very little respect for the little people like you and me. When it comes to corruption and criminal misconduct in the courts, the Democrats and Republicans are on the same page. It's hands off. And you can take that to the bank. Because Congress has abdicated its oversight responsibility in regards to the federal courts, the Judicial Branch now has hegemony over the Executive and Legislative branches. That is the reason for the brutal fights over judicial appointees, a la Brett Kavanaugh.
At the time I made my complaints with the FBI and DOJ, William Barr was not the Attorney General. It is my hope that Mr. Barr will have the integrity and the courage to focus on the collusion and obstruction of justice that occurred with my case in the Ninth Circuit; and that he will hold these officials accountable for their criminal misconduct that violated the public's trust and caused lasting harm to the judiciary. Clearly, the members of Congress I contacted are engaged in a cover-up. More details on this scandal can be found at:
Now that the investigation into possible Trump-Russia collusion during the past presidential election is over, the FBI should now focus on the investigation of cases of collusion and obstruction of justice by government officials that are not motivated by politics. I'm referring to cases where government officials' conduct is so egregious that it shows a wilful and wanton disregard for the truth and the rule of law. I have presented evidence of such a case to the FBI and the Department of Justice for investigation on several different occasions. No investigation has been initiated. The case I am referring to involves a conspiracy between San Jose city officials, my former attorney, and several federal court officials to obstruct justice during lawsuits I filed against the City of San Jose for racial and disability discrimination. I am black/African American. Many of the details of this case have been discussed in some of my prior posts. See my posts on August 23, 2015 and July 31, 2017. The conduct of the involved officials is so reprehensible that some of the details are worth repeating. During litigation in my lawsuits several felonies were committed by my attorney, attorneys for the City of San Jose and several court officials that include judges. Among the crimes these officials committed were conspiracy to obstruct justice and obstruction of justice, perjury and subornation of perjury, bribery and fraud. Details of some of the crimes they committed include falsifying court records, staging a fake hearing on a motion I filed, fabricating a phony transcript and civil minutes for that hearing and fraudulently dismissing an individual defendant from my lawsuit without my knowledge and authorization. Additionally the district court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals entered judgments in my lawsuit that violate statutory law and binding precedent. The judgments are clearly void judgments, but the courts refuse to vacate them. What makes this even more sickening is that all of these officials are officers of the court and the purpose of their misconduct was to hide the bigotry and racism of San Jose city officials directed at me.This is all true. But neither the truth nor the law seem to matter in the Ninth Circuit. Officials involved are either current or former high ranking officials in the City of San Jose and the Ninth Circuit. These officials include San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo, former mayor Chuck Reed, San Jose City Attorney Richard Doyle, retired US District Judge Ronald M. Whyte, US Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins, retired Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals former Chief Judge Alex Kozinski and current Chief Judge Sidney R. Thomas. This scandal is bigger than the college admissions scandal, the Jussie Smollett scandal, the scandal involving the FBI and DOJ relative to the investigation of the Trump campaign, and the Trump-Russia collusion scandal. It is one of the biggest abuses of power and corruption cases in quite some time.
It is reasonable to say that we now have the weakest, most corrupt and ineffective leaders in Congress in the entire history of our once great nation. They have no courage or integrity when it comes to exercising oversight over the rogue and completely out of control Ninth Circuit, as is mandated by the Constitution. It is true folks. Over the past several years, I have made formal complaints with individual members of Congress and the House and Senate Judiciary Committees against the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the US District Court in San Jose. I received only one pathetic response from Senator Dianne Feinstein essentially stating that she had no guts to do anything. At least she had the integrity to respond. Other current members of Congress I sent letters to, Senator Lindsey Graham, Senator Kamala Harris, Senator Chuck Grassley, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, and Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren did not extend me the courtesy of a response.
The Democrats are so quick to exercise oversight of President Trump with endless investigations into all aspects of his life without any suspicion of wrongdoing. Yet, they fail to take any action on indisputable facts and evidence I presented to them that officials within the Ninth Circuit conspired with San Jose city officials to commit several felonies during litigation of my lawsuits against the City. By no means do Democrats have the market cornered on weakness and cowardice when it comes to exercising oversight over the Judicial Branch. The Republicans are just as guilty, notwithstanding their phony claim to be so in love with the Constitution and the rule of law.
Don't be fooled. The Democrats and Republicans are more alike than they are different. All of the phony policy differences are just a game. They are all about obtaining and retaining power. They are all elites who have very little respect for the little people like you and me. When it comes to corruption and criminal misconduct in the courts, the Democrats and Republicans are on the same page. It's hands off. And you can take that to the bank. Because Congress has abdicated its oversight responsibility in regards to the federal courts, the Judicial Branch now has hegemony over the Executive and Legislative branches. That is the reason for the brutal fights over judicial appointees, a la Brett Kavanaugh.
At the time I made my complaints with the FBI and DOJ, William Barr was not the Attorney General. It is my hope that Mr. Barr will have the integrity and the courage to focus on the collusion and obstruction of justice that occurred with my case in the Ninth Circuit; and that he will hold these officials accountable for their criminal misconduct that violated the public's trust and caused lasting harm to the judiciary. Clearly, the members of Congress I contacted are engaged in a cover-up. More details on this scandal can be found at:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)